GRABOVO, Ukraine — A Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 with 298 people aboard exploded, crashed and burned on a flowered wheat field Thursday in a part of eastern Ukraine controlled by pro-Russia separatists, blown out of the sky at 33,000 feet by what Ukrainian and American officials described as a Russian-made antiaircraft missile.
Ukraine accused the separatists of carrying out what it called a terrorist attack. American intelligence and military officials said the plane had been destroyed by a Russian SA-series missile, based on surveillance satellite data that showed the final trajectory and impact of the missile but not its point of origin.
There were strong indications that those responsible may have errantly downed what they had thought was a military aircraft only to discover, to their shock, that they had struck a civilian airliner. Everyone aboard was killed, their corpses littered among wreckage that smoldered late into the summer night.
Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin, blamed Ukraine’s government for creating what he called conditions for insurgency in eastern Ukraine, where separatists have bragged about shooting down at least three Ukrainian military aircraft. But Mr. Putin did not specifically deny that a Russian-made weapon had felled the Malaysian jetliner.
Whatever the cause, the news of the crashed plane, with a passenger manifest that spanned at least nine countries, elevated the insurgency into a new international crisis. The day before, the United States had slapped new sanctions on Russia for its support of the pro-Kremlin insurgency, which has brought East-West relations to their lowest point in many years.
Making the crash even more of a shock, it was the second time within months that Malaysia Airlines had suffered a mass-casualty flight disaster with international intrigue — and with the same model plane, a Boeing 777-200ER.
Read article here.
ABA IHRLD 2014 Participants,
Thank you for participating in the 2nd Annual ABA International Human Rights Lobby Day on June 19, 2014. We couldn't have done it without you! Please take a moment to share your lobby day experience with us by completing our Feedback Form. Your responses, comments and suggestions will help us focus our resources and efforts as well as highlight areas for improvement going forward.
HELPFUL INFO & TIPS
INFO: Select your primary level of participation from the drop-down menu on page 1. The form will advance to the appropriate section based on your answer here.
TIP 1: If your lobby day efforts included more than one primary level of participation, select "In person lobbyists" (D.C. or local), answer the remaining questions on the page, and then click the "Continue" button. Complete all relevant sections (i.e., sections that pertain to your levels of participation).
INFO: In person and phone lobbyists who did not participate at any other primary level AND who made contact with more than three (3) congressional members’ offices should answer “Yes” when asked about additional contacts. Answer the remainder of the questions on the page and then click “Continue”. You will be redirected to a supplemental page that allows you to provide details and feedback about additional office visits or phone contacts.
TIP 2: SKIP the question on additional congressional contacts if you participated in more than one capacity and wish to provide feedback on all levels of participation. Note: You will still be able to provide info about additional contacts. The difference here is that you will be able to complete other sections before reaching the additional contacts page.
INFO: Those who provide feedback on more than one primary level of participation may encounter some of the same question(s) in different sections.
For example, at the end of each section we ask, “Can you we count on you to participate in next year’s lobby day?” If you only participated at one level, say social media, you will only see this question once. Those who participated in more than one capacity and provide feedback about each may see the question more than once.
TIP 3: You may skip any question that appears in another section if previously answered.
INFO: Questions marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
TIP 4: If you cannot advance to the next page/section or if you receive an error message when attempting to submit the form, check to make sure you have answered all required questions.
Contact IHRC immediately at inthumrights@gmail.com if you have any questions or experience any issues completing or submitting this feedback form.
Today ABA Members and supporters are meeting with U.S. Members of Congress on Capitol Hill and at local district offices to speak with them about international human rights issues. Specifically, we are asking congressional leaders to (a) ratify the UN Convention to Eliminate All Forms of Discriminations Against Women (CEDAW), (b) ratify the UN Convention on the Rights of Person with Disabilities (CRPD), and (c) increase support of the International Criminal Court (ICC).
Read on to see how you can participate, increase awareness of global human rights issues, and make #ABA_IHRLD2014 a huge success.
★ LOBBY IN PERSON - It's too late to sign up to lobby in person, but we want to thank all of our in-person lobbyists. Whether you are on Capitol Hill or at your local district office, we appreciate your hard work and passion about global human rights. Lobby on and let us know how it's going!
★ LOBBY BY PHONE - Call the U.S. Capitol Switchboard at (202) 224-3121 and ask to the speak to your representatives and senators. Ask them to support #ABA_IHRLD2014 and our three lobby day issues. To locate your congressional members, visit www.house.gov and www.senate.gov.
★ LOBBY BY EMAIL - Visit the ABA Grassroots Action Center and send your congressional leaders a pre-scripted email on one or all of our lobby day issues.
★ LOBBY BY TWITTER - Lookup your congressional leaders' verified Twitter handle and send a short Tweet, asking for support (e.g., “@GabbyGiffords support #ABA_IHRLD2014, please ask #USSenate to increase support for #ICC, ratify #CEDAW and ratify #CRPD. Thanks!")
★ SOCIAL MEDIA SUPPORT - Our #ABA_IHRLD2014 Social Media Toolkit contains an active-link slideshow, 1-pagers on each of the lobby day issues, and graphics. You may download, embed and share some or all the items. Our SMT is also available at slideshare.net/ABA_IHRC.
CONTACT INFO
Contact IHRC Co-Chair Elizabeth "Liz" Turchi at lizturchi@gmail.com for more information on lobbying on Capitol Hill or at the local level.
Contact IHRC Communications Vice Chair Stephanie Williams at inthumrights@gmail.com if you have questions about virtual lobbying or promoting this event via social media.
#ABA_IHRLD2014
@ABAIHRC
*Note: This post was originally published as a reminder on 06/18 and updated as announcement on 06/19.
Indian students of Saint Joseph Degree college participate in an anti-rape protest in Hyderabad on September 13, 2013.(NOAH SEELAM/AFP/Getty Images)
By Terrance McCoy, Washington Post
One of the girls wore crimson, the other emerald. They had long black hair. They were barefoot. They were cousins and of a low caste. As shown in gruesome photographs, they were barely more than children.
One was 14 and the other was 15, police said. Without a toilet in their home, they had gone outside to relieve themselves the night before and had now been found dead, hanging from a mango tree framed by a rising sun.
A crowd of villagers swelled underneath the bodies Wednesday morning. Reports said they wouldn’t allow anyone to cut down the girls until arrests were made, so for hours, they waited in near silence. Then came news that four men had been arrested for the crime. Two of the accused were villagers who lived in Katra in Uttar Pradesh state. The other two, the Associated Press reported, were police officers.
Autopsy reports confirmed the children had been raped and strangled. News of the attack splashed across nearly every major publication in India. Even in a country where a rape occurs every 22 minutes, according to Indian government statistics reported by the AP, the gang-rape and killing was shocking.
Shocking because of its sheer brutality. Shocking because two suspects are police officers. And shocking because even after 2012′s fatal gang-rape — in which a woman’s insides were mangled with a metal rod — and tightening of national anti-rape laws, men in India have committed the crime again.
Excerpt, read more here.
By Stephanie Macuiba
Egypt just elected former army chief Abdel-Fattah El-Sisi in its second presidential election following the 2011 ousting of Hosni Mubarak. Egypt had been without an elected president since Muslim Brotherhood-backed Mohamed Morsi was forcibly removed in 2013, less than a year after taking office.
President Sisi won the seat by a landslide causing supporters to cheer and critics to wince. So was the second democratic Egyptian presidential election free and fair?
What about candidates?
This election involved two candidates, Sisi and his opponent Hamdeen Sabahi. As a comparison, the 2012 ballot contained 13 presidential hopefuls.
President Sisi rose to fame after the military assisted in the ousting of President Morsi. The Egyptian people called for the removal of Morsi after he usurped governmental powers and fumbled with the economy. Following the ousting, Sisi generated a cult-like following within the country appearing on everything from shirts to key chains.
President Sisi officially dropped his military title to run as a civilian. Yet he remained strongly backed by the military raising serious concerns for some that another Egyptian autocracy was on the brink. Former members of the military backed Sisi and dropped out of the presidential running as a sign of support.
Sisi’s only opponent was Hamdeen Sabahi, who came in third during the 2012 election receiving around 20 percent of votes. Sabahi is a lifetime opposition activist. He became famous in the late 1970’s for publicly criticizing then-president Anwar Sadat. A largely unheard of act at the time. Sabahi’s campaign rallied around social justice and freedom.
Critics argued that Sabahi’s presence gave an illegitimate election a façade of legitimacy claiming Sisi had been set up to win by the interim government.
Opinions silenced?
The Western media and human rights groups have accused the interim government of silencing opinions, perhaps to Mubarak levels, following the removal of President Morsi. Creating an environment that prevented a truly free and fair election.
Muslim Brotherhood
The Muslim Brotherhood, held mass sit-ins and protests following Morsi’s overthrow. The rallies have become places of violence with Brotherhood members blaming police for using force and police blaming the Brotherhood for inciting violence.
With tensions between the two mounting, the government blamed a December car bomb attack on the organization and designated it a terrorist organization. According to the Associated Press, 1,300 Muslim Brotherhood supporters and 450 police officers have been killed in the 11 month interim.
Recently, human rights groups have criticized a mass death sentence given to Muslim Brotherhood members that attended a rally that lead to the death of a police officer. Senior officials told the Associated Press that the number of jailed Islamists is 16,000 including 3,000 mid to high level ranking Muslim Brotherhood members. Critics argue the Sisi-supporting regime is silencing people like the Mubarak regime (The Muslim Brotherhood was outlawed until the 2011 Revolution). Proponents, including many citizens, argue the hardliner approach is necessary to curb unprecedented street violence.
Demonstration Law
Last fall, with increasing unrest, the interim government enacted a law that banned all demonstrations unless approved by authorities.
Supporters said the law was necessary to stabilize Egypt and curb violence, citing similar Western laws restricting public assembly. Critics, including the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay, warned that the law proscribed excessive sanctions and was not well defined leaving a potential for abuse. Many activists have been jailed since its enactment including the founder of the April 6 Movement, who had been an important force in the 2011 Revolution.
Media
During the campaign, the role of the media became a center point for those concerned with the fairness of the election.
The Committee to Protect Journalists, currently lists 16 detained journalists, the most since the organization was founded in 1981. Notably, four Al Jazeera journalists are being detained without charge. The European Union election observer mission noted that these imprisonments lead to an environment of restricted media and even self-censorship.
During the campaign, Sabahi complained to BBC that media coverage was one sided. Arguing President Sisi dominated the news circuits and received dramatically more camera time than Sabahi. The EU observer mission, noted that public media gave equal time to each candidate while private media gave nearly double time to Sisi.
According to an independent Egyptian newspaper, former 2012 presidential nominee Khaled Ali dropped out of the 2014 race claiming it to be a shame. Citing media persecution of anyone that goes against the majority account of events.
Voter Turnout?
On the first day of voting in Egypt, numbers were low and blamed on unseasonable heat. Tuesday was declared a national holiday to increase voter turnout and by mid Tuesday the elections were extended into Wednesday. The unexpected extension raised international concern but both candidates also filed complaints with the election commission.
Unofficial results indicate that Sisi won 93 percent of the vote. Void ballots accounted for 4 percent and Sabahi received just 3 percent of the vote. Turnout was estimated at 46 percent, lower than the 52 percent that showed up for the 2012 election. Sisi had called for a record setting turnout to legitimize his election and the earlier ousting of Morsi.
Was the landslide vote a true reflection of Egyptian sentiment? Maybe not. Many voters protested the election. The April 6 movement called for a boycott after the jailing of their leader under the demonstration law. And a number of Muslim Brotherhood members considered the election illegitimate and refused to participate.
Take Away
The current instability and polarization in Egypt prevented a textbook free and fair presidential election. President Sisi was supported by the military-backed interim government with little opposition at a time when free assembly was largely restricted.
Yet, the exhausted Egyptian people see Sisi as their ticket to stability and economic success even if that is at the cost of textbook democracy. All eyes will be on President Sisi to see if he can stabilize Egypt without using oppressive measures like his autocratic predecessors.
Stephanie Macuiba graduated from Southern Illinois University School of Law and recently passed the Illinois and California state bar exams. She completed internships at the Arab Center for Rule of Law in Beirut, Lebanon and the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative in New Delhi, India. The International Association of Law Schools awarded her a young human rights scholar award for her article on indefinite detention at Guantanamo Bay. She currently works and lives in Los Angeles.
